On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Nathan Brindle wrote: > That's dangerous. In some cases you might delete someone you didn't > intend to delete with that construction. I admit we're probably talking > extreme cases, but the fact remains that a delete for joe@*soft.com would > not only delete [log in to unmask] and [log in to unmask], but also [log in to unmask], > [log in to unmask], et cetera ad nauseum...when you do that sort of wildcard > delete you might want to try it with the (TEST option first. Thanks, I was going to sugest that you confirm who you are deleting before using ANY wild card setting. I haven't done that myself, so I don't know what the results are, but you will ``destroy'' settings if you delete, and recreate a user, so it's worth testing first... Jessica -- Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668. List manager: [log in to unmask] send command help ---- To get help with majordomo or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server. WWW: <http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Andes/8749>