On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Jacob Haller wrote: > If you want to hold onto your beer money after those revelations I > think it's understandable. ;-) It was indeed a bad example to use to make a point. The point was that sometimes lists are not used for voluntary discussions where the List Owner should have total access to the subscribership. Currently, we get around it with a Super List owned by a faulty member who is editor, with students subscribed to a sub-list that said faculty member does not own and use REVIEW= Owner. A programmed mail server that feeds the sub-list owns the sub-list "quietly". This is probably more complicated than it has to be, but it works with our privacy policies. Well, one day a lady will walk into the Lsoft offices and shout, "Who wants to go for a beer?". That would be me. --Trish, Queen's University