> > If this is the wrong procedure for doing such a thing then we have been > > doing it wrong for years, on thousands of lists. But on the same hand it > > has worked for us for years this way as well. The person who is listed as > > the Quiet Owner can send to the list and never get the postings, now > > obviously if you subscribed them then that would change that! > > Personaly, I wouldn't do that with any of my lists. If you want a > person to be able to POST, you don't want them as an ``owner'', because > that is a matter of giving them full power over the list, which is > unnescesary. You could make them an editor, which should have the same > effect (at least if the list is edited), but grant them no list owner > rights. You can also subscribe them, and set them to nomail. Which will > allow them to post (provided ``mere'' subscribers can post), without > recieving list mail. I would simply subscribe them with POST NOMAIL. Paul