LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (21 lines)
Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Barak Moshe <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 08:35:44 +0200
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Pete Weiss wrote:
<Snip>
>
> What would be preferrable from my point of view, is a LISTSERV(R)
> requirements group.  That way, there is more equitable access to the
> development team, and not just based on volume of postings on lstown-l.
>

I agree, but I also think that some times a 'brain storming' like process,
has it's benefits for everyone. I don't see this as 'politics', just people who
work with the package on a daily basis and tell their needs based on their
experince. Had I been on the vendor side, I would only but encourage this.
Best,
Moshe




> /Pete Weiss -- Penn State
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2