Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:19:01 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Stan Horwitz wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 [log in to unmask] wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 12:33pm, Stan Horwitz wrote:
>> } Subject: Post, but not read articles
>> } One of my colleagues has an unmoderated list. He wants his department's
>> } receptionist to be able to post messages on his list, but not receive any
>> } messages from the list or have access to the list's archived messages.
>> } Subscribing the receptionist and setting her subscription options to
>> } NOMAIL will not prevent her from accessing the list's archives. Does
>> } anyone have a suggestion on how this might be done?
>> This may be a foolish question Stan, but if she is posting to the list
>> why don't you want her to see the archives? After all, she has seen
>> them when posting (or don't you want her to see the replies?).
>> Can't you tell her "Don't peek" or we slap you on the wrist?
>Its not me who has this need, its a colleague in a different department.
>Apparantly, there is discussion on the list that is not intended for this
>receptionist to see. Anyway, I thank you all for your ideas. I have
>forwarded them to my colleague who can decide which idea he prefers.
I would suggest that he set the list to subscription=by owner so
that she cannot subscribe. Then she can mail her postings to him
personally at his own email address and he can us a simple F (forward)
to the list.
--
Jan George Frajkor _!_
School of Journalism, Carleton Univ. --!--
1125 Colonel By Drive |
Ottawa, Ontario /^\
Canada K1S 5B6 /^\ /^\
[log in to unmask] / [log in to unmask]
o: 613 520-7404 fax: 613 520-6690 h: 613 563-4534
|
|
|