|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:14:57 -0800 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Outlook Express is the main reason my list is configured with "Reply-to=
Both,Ignore" This way BOTH the list and sender address is in the To box of
replies, the only challenge is training folks to REMOVE the list address if they
wish the reply to be private. If they leave both, then the original sender gets
the message twice - which is nice if they are on digest they'll get a reply long
before they see the digest (but sometimes confuses those who are on
individual messages). We also have new subscribers on moderation for the
first few posts to insure that they don't post something to the list that was
meant to be private.
On 31 Oct 2005 at 11:51, Clark Pickett wrote:
> I notice that Kevin's list is configured with:
>
> Reply-to= List,Ignore
>
> If he changes that to:
>
> Reply-to= List,Respect
>
> and the original sender's message header includes a Reply-to entry, the reply
> will be addressed to the original sender.
|
|
|