Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:45:15 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:36 , Jeff Kiesel <[log in to unmask]> said:
> We're running 5.5. What problems did you have with 5.5 in the past?
I don't speak from direct experience but from reports about 5.5, 2003 is
from direct testing.
--
Alan Thew [log in to unmask]
Computing Services, University of Liverpool Fax: +44 151 794-4442
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Thew [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:29 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Sender receiving OOO Replies
>
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:24 , A. Harry Williams <[log in to unmask]> said:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:40:46 -0400 Jeff Kiesel said:
>>> So how can this problem be resolved? If I participate on a list with
> 3,000
>>> members, I'm expected to endure thousands of OOO replies each time I post
> to
>>> the list? There has to be a better way.
>>
>> Only if they are all away and they run Outlook. One better way would be
>> to run a better client.
>>
> Outlook with Exchange 2003 seems to work well with LISTSERV, Exchange 5.5
> certainly has problems.
>>
>>>
> <snip>
>
> --
> Alan Thew [log in to unmask]
> Computing Services, University of Liverpool Fax: +44 151 794-4442
>
|
|
|