On: Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0500,[log in to unmask] Wrote:

} Hal  wrote on 02/06/2008 01:04:11 PM:
}
} > Let's see, now: You realize that SA is not reporting the spam scores,
} and
} > you left out the content of the message. That doesn't give them much
} data to
} > work with.
}
} Realistically, only the folks that run the server (LSoft) are likely to be
} able to tell why SA triggered on this message.  Hopefully they can review
} the logs and find the answer.  Sitting on the outside, none of us have any
} idea why...

Thats what I thought also, but looking more carefully, it appears (as
shown in my previous post) that Lsoft has nothing to do with the bounce.

} It may not have been a change at the sender's ISP, it could have been a
} change in the SA rules applied, or there could have been something in the
} message that triggered it.  Was there a URL list on one of the URIBLs?

No URL that I saw.

--
Rich Greenberg  N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians  Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach                                     Asst Owner:Sibernet-L