Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 12 Sep 1992 14:57:00 N |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Sep 1992 13:31:53 +0200, Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> said:
>>are the licensors of LISTSERV and LISTEARN in the process of considering
>>how to handle the situation of a reducing number of BITNET etc. sites
>>that, under current licencing policies, are entitled to run these
>>extremely useful packages, and even more so in view of the fact that
>>they do serve non-BITNET etc. sites (Internet, UUCP/EUNET, etc.)?
>
> Concretely, what are you trying to say?
>
> Eric
I guess that I was wondering whether there are, and even more will be
ways in which LISTSERV and/or LISTEARN are and/or will be at the dis-
posal of non-BITNET sites in view of the suspected phasing out of BIT-
NET -- whether for free or for a fee?
Aer denna foerklaring `lagom', Eric?
Herman J. Woltring.
|
|
|