Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTOWN-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTOWN-L Home LSTOWN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OK failed on editor,hold list
From:
Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Jul 1995 21:33:38 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
But it doesn't make sense for one person to be able to send the OK for
a message that was originally meant for someone else to OK.  That defeats
the purpose, Roger.  Remember that the OK "magic cookie" mechanism isn't
just used to approve postings that get bounced to the editor on
Send= Editor,Hold.  It's used for a lot of other things as well that
you would NOT want just anyone sending an OK for.  To change that
would be a major mistake.  The OK mechanism is specifically aimed at
making sure that person A who sent the command is <really> person A,
and not person B who is spoofing commands.  That's why it's actually
more secure than a password.
 
I'll document it--it's a good point--but it sure seems pretty obvious
to me.  In a discussion of the OK mechanism (which I do need to write)
it would be quite clear that person B can't OK person A's editorial
submissions.
 
Nathan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV