Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 1996 11:31:29 EDT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 2 Jul 1996 08:12:16 -0700 Richard Burkett said:
>So, Eric:
>When, oh when is the archive search going to be reinstituted for listservs
>running on PCs? The list I help run (over 3000 members strong) has a LOT of
>topics that keep coming up time and again that could be easily answered with
>a quick search of the archives.
Yes, the archive search feature is highly desirable. But there is a less
desirable side effect being revealed here: doing a possibly CPU intensive
search to get an answer that should (a) be in a FAQ or (b) have been included
in the "welcome" message. We have netnews at this site and I'm not too fond
of it. There's too much traffic and too high a percentage of it is crap
from airheads: but boy, do I ever like news.answers. Or, if the FAQ I want
isn't on the local system then a quick FTP to rtfm.mit.edu. Archive search
is inherently a good thing. Archive search jobs can be done right. But,
in practice, archive search is a royal cpu pig when used in a culture that
doesn't exploit the wonders of a good FAQ file.
-Kary
P.S: This was intended as a general observation and no specific slight was
intended to the submitter, his list or his site. Is anybody else nostalgic
for the days when you could have a discussion in the US without having to
add an explanation for the reading-context challenged?
|
|
|