On Mon, 11 Aug 1997 09:50:32 -0500 PHREdd said:
>I'll admit: I did go through the documentation, and can't find anything
>relating to my specific case:
>
>We have one user who needs his/her posts approved through one of hte
>owners.
>
>is:
>
>set sex-l editor for [log in to unmask]
>
>(valid)?
Yes, it's valid, but that's not what you want. You want
SET SEX-L REVIEW FOR [log in to unmask]
Otherwise you're giving the user permission to post without benefit of
editor :) Note also that if the user unsubs and resubs, the REVIEW
setting will be reset unless it's a Default-Option=.
Nathan