Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:46:00 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:55:40 -0400 Stephen W. Thompson said:
>QUESTION: Is there a way to get a report of all subscribers who would
> get messages sent to the super-list? I've read the manual and
> searched the archives about super-lists with no leads.
No. (If there were it would be documented :)
>So LISTD would end up sending duplications to 'person', one to each
>subscription.
Correct, because as far as LISTSERV knows, [log in to unmask] and [log in to unmask]
are two completely different people.
>I fear the feature I'd hoped for wasn't designed into super-lists.
>Issuing 'query LISTD for *@*' gave me only the person directly
>subscribed to LISTD (me), not all the potential recipients.
Yes, because QUERY was not designed to be aware of super-lists and will
give you only the information for subscribers on the list you've asked
about.
>Might there be a SUPERSCAN command that would return SCAN-like results
>on a super-list? SUPERQUERY that does QUERYs on super-lists?
No, there is not, and I am not aware of any plan to incorporate such
features...
Nathan
|
|
|