Mon, 11 May 1998 18:01:42 -0400
|
>is there a naming tradition or format for lists. I am trying to clean up
>our existing structure and would like to follow the rest of the universe.
>thanks.
There are a couple of conventions, but it appears that few people follow
them these days. The ones I've noticed that are somewhat common are:
1) Moderated mailing lists end in "-M" (e.g. "BLUES-M"). Generally this is
used to distinguish two mailing lists with a similar function, one of which
is moderated and the other of which is not.
2) Mailing lists end in "-L" (e.g. "JAZZ-L"). This convention allows users
to identify mailing list mail relatively easily. (One could have a Eudora
filter, for instance, that filters mail with "-L@" in the header into a
special 'mailing lists' folder.)
Generally, it's nice to have a name that will be readily recognizable as
coming from a mailing list. Also, it's good to have a fairly short
name--because you'll have to type it in every time you issue a command
relating to the mailing list.
-jwgh
|
|
|