|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:21:42 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Paul Karagianis wrote:
> On 12 Oct 98, at 16:19, Nathan Brindle wrote:
>
> >More properly speaking, LISTSERV is a daemon, not a robot.
> >
> >Quite frankly the description "mailing list manager" is probably still
> >the best, although the acronym MLM unfortunately also refers to a
> >questionable type of get-rich-quick scheme :(
> >
> >Nathan
>
> I've been using "automaton" for years with no complaints. I'm sure it
> has its problems, but so does "Daemon" which has its roots in Multics
> and refers to a Gatekeeper... derived from (James Clerk?) Maxwell's
> benevolent-demons "daemons" in thought experiments where they would
> operate the gate between two vials of gas and only let the the molecules
> pass in one direction. Multics Daemons typically were privileged and
> acted as the gate-keepers between security rings to verify user requests
> for limited system services. Unix' use of the term is as sloppy as every-
> thing else they borrowed without fully groking.
>
Fielded 3 calls today concerning Listserv - each of these List owners had
a problem with 'people being unable to post to my Listserv'. Usually it
was caused by subscribers changing their email addresses and becoming
persona no grata to Listserv. Polite re-education eventually drove home
the point - initial comments ranged from "oh, come on!" to "oh, for f***s
sake - what's the big deal". Actually it's a very big deal I told them.
They are now all aware of the difference between Listserv the product and
a Listserv-managed mailing list.
The message is getting across slowly but surely. :)
Scotty
--
Steve Howie [log in to unmask]
Netnews and Listserv Admin 519 824-4120 x2556
University of Guelph
"If it's not Scottish it's CRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPP!"
|
|
|