|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 1999 13:23:36 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
This reply prepared using Outlook 98. I do NOT understand your concerns.
-----Original Message-----
From: LISTSERV list owners' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Peter C.S. Adams
Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 6:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: reply to reproaches
Don Wiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> As for dual header. On some corporate LANs with gateways the name and
> address are stripped from the From field and replaced with something else.
Since Outlook Express is too stupid to put the "Don Wiss
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:" at the top of my replies for me, I have to
do it manually. I use DUALHDR for this. Very handy, and I'd hate it if a
listowner changed it on me. Next time, it would be better to send a QUERY
LISTNAME WITH IETFHDR FOR *@* to listserv and then only change them to
FULLHDR.
Ben Parker <[log in to unmask]> added:
> A second downside, is that the necessary header lines for processing MIME
> messages are also removed.
Personally, I consider this a plus! ;->
--
Peter C.S. Adams <[log in to unmask]>
co-owner, PAGEMAKR mailing list <http://www.hypercorp.com/gain/pm/>
"Common courtesy is not so common." -- apologies to Voltaire
|
|
|