|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:59:05 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Chris Anderson wrote:
> I disagree. I find that it is very convenient to highlight a point in my
> email with an appropriate underline, or color it red, or bold it, etc.
> Communications is about getting your point across. Whatever tools that you
> have to do that just makes your job the easier.
Well, I disagree with you for the very reasons you cite in your next
paragraph. Again, it just boils down to aesthetics.
>
> Why do you think that such conventions as *bold* or _underline_ or SHOUT or
> '> quoted text' came about? They are workarounds to the limitations of
> 7-bit plan ascii text.
>
Hardly limitations if you ask me. Face it, 7-bit ascii text is going to be
here for a long long time.
Scotty
--
Steve Howie [log in to unmask]
Netnews and Listserv Admin 519 824-4120 x2556
University of Guelph
"If it's not Scottish it's CRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPP!"
|
|
|