I don't understand what about this posting triggered Listserv to think that
it was meant to be a command. Can anyone help us avoid a recurrence by
pointing out the pattern? TIA

>Subject:      Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
>
>Your  message is  being returned  to you  unprocessed because  it looks
>like a
>LISTSERV command, rather than material intended for distribution to the
>members
>of the ALL-LIB list. Please note that  LISTSERV commands must ALWAYS be
>sent to
>the LISTSERV address; if it was indeed  a command you were attempting to
>issue,
>please send it  again to [log in to unmask] for  execution. Otherwise,
>please
>accept our apologies  and try to rewrite the message  with a slightly
>different
>wording -  for instance, change  the first word of  the message, enclose
>it in
>quotation marks, insert a line of dashes at the beginning of your message,
>etc.
>
>------------------------ Rejected message (29 lines)
>--------------------------
>Received: from pop.uky.edu by lsv.uky.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.0a) with
SMTP id F3709CC0 ; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 9:19:07 -0400
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>X-Sender: same one of our staff
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 09:19:03 -0400
>To: [log in to unmask]
>From: one of our staff
>Subject: re: decentralization focus groups
>
>Please send mail to "a certain someone" at   some@where   if you want to
>sign up for the focus groups on August 26.
>
>Her return email address is incorrect in her email messages.  We are trying
>to get this corrected.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Tari
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>.....standard looking signature