I hope someone here can throw light on this problem. On Saturday,
Nov. 1, I sent a message to my list, AUTOCAT. I and most of the
recipients received it that same day. However, at least one
recipient, in the UK, did not receive it until today (Thursday, Nov. 6)
Can someone read these header lines to tell what happened. Is the
source of the delay at the receiving site, here at Buffalo, or where?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Judith Hopkins, Listowner of Autocat
[log in to unmask]
http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~ulcjh
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:49:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: Rose-Ann Movsovic <[log in to unmask]>
To: Judith Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Something should change?? (fwd)
Judith,
I'm forwarding back the full header from your message as our computer
services people have interepreted the Autocat messages to be delayed on
the listserv server, rather than anywhere en route. Maybe it's the date
stamping? Did you send your message on Saturday or today (Thursday)?
It's all a bit of a mystery to me, I'm afraid.
Regards,
Rose-Ann
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Delivery-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:14:24 +0000
Received: from listserv.ja.net by sumh1.rdg.ac.uk with ESMTP;
Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:14:23 +0000
Received: from listserv (130.246.132.24) by listserv.ja.net (LSMTP
for Windows NT v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>;
Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:14:28 +0000
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 14:55:04 -0500
Reply-To: "AUTOCAT: Library cataloging and authorities discussion group"
<[log in to unmask]> ,
Judith Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: "AUTOCAT: Library cataloging and authorities discussion group"
<[log in to unmask]>
From: Judith Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Something should change??
Comments: To: Peony Shum <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Message-ID: <"sumh1.readin:001340:971106121424"@reading.ac.uk>
|
