Hi,

 maybe this could be a problem of the changes in Germany.

 The central Germany LISTSERV was moved on 1-Dec-2004 from Fraunhofer
 IMK to the FZK. I know about a lot of problems in the first two days.
 But as I heard, now everything should be work fine again.

 Christian Bonkowski

am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 um 16:43 schrieben Sie:

> Some of our subscribers, mainly the ones in Germany, are
> complaining that their messages are taking several days for
> delivery.  The header from one of these, after it was finally
> delivered, is appended below.  The problem has persisted for the
> past few days.  Does anyone know if there is anything to do here
> besides wait?


> George Buckner
> Owner, ASSC-*@LISTSERV.UH.EDU

> =====

> From: David Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 1 December 2004 12:32:29 GMT+01:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ASSC8 Book
> Reply-To: ASSC Executive Committee <[log in to unmask]>
> Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
> Received: from sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de ([unix socket]) by
> sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de (Cyrus v2.1.17) with LMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2004
> 15:05:43 +0100
> Received: from mail.uni-magdeburg.de (mail.uni-magdeburg.de
> [141.44.1.10]) by sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with
> ESMTP id iB2E53Dh018370 for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu,
> 2 Dec 2004 15:05:03 +0100
> Received: from fzkmail2.fzk.de ([141.52.27.52]) by
> mail.uni-magdeburg.de with smtp (EXIM Version 4.43) for
> <[log in to unmask]> id 1CZrZo-00040P-Kw; Thu, 02 Dec
> 2004 15:05:03 +0100
> Received: FROM listserv.fzk.de BY fzkmail2.fzk.de ; Thu Dec 02
> 15:04:50 2004 +0100
> Received: from listserv (listserv [141.52.2.19]) by listserv.fzk.de
> (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id iB2E4oD22553; Thu, 2 Dec 2004
> 15:04:50 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from LISTSERV.UH.EDU by LISTSERV.UH.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
> release 1.8d) with spool id 3209729 for [log in to unmask]; Wed, 1
> Dec 2004 05:29:30 -0600
> Received: from anu.edu.au (anumail3.anu.edu.au [150.203.2.43]) by
> Post-Office.UH.EDU (PMDF V6.0-025 #30827) with ESMTP id
> <[log in to unmask]> for [log in to unmask]; Wed,
> 01 Dec 2004 05:29:30 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from eden.anu.edu.au (eden.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.127]) by
> anu.edu.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB1BTRLM008498 for
> <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:29:28 +1100 (EST)
> Received: by eden.anu.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 503) id AF29A9C2C2;
> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:32:29 +1100 (EST)
> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: ASSC Executive Committee <[log in to unmask]>
> In-Reply-To:
> <[log in to unmask] du>
> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
> X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -2.6 points, 5.0
> required; -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability
> is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] ---- End of SpamAssassin results
> X-Scan-Signature: 0d6096193d840787956b6f66347a85f5