LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"Philip Janus (at home)" <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 8 Jan 1996 10:41:50 -0500
text/plain (35 lines)
At 22:06 01/07/96 -0500, you wrote:
>> .netcom and .ix.netcom are separate accounts.  One is a netcom
>> shell, the latter, NetCruiser graphic interface.  I can't get to
>> NetCruiser without paying, registering, etc.
>
>If you pay for the Netcruiser account, do you get the shell account
>automatically?  What I'm thinking is that if you put a filter on an
>abuser's ix address, can he get around it by simply logging in through
>his shell account and sending from there?  The abuser might not even be
>aware of how Listserv filters work, he might just randomly use his shell
>account and unwittingly bypass the filter.  If this is true, then it
>might be wise to set a filter with a wildcard in nectom addresses, e.g.
>
>   Filter= badboy@*netcom.com
>
>-- Roger Burns    [log in to unmask]
>
 
No. What he said was that .netcom and .ix.netcom are separate accounts.
Period. The Netcruiser people pay a significantly lower rate in exchange for
having to go through the Netcruiser interface, and they are .ix'ers. The
shell people actually make fun of the .ix'ers.
 
You'd have to check, but I'm pretty certain that [log in to unmask] and
[log in to unmask] are two separate accounts run by two different people.
 
Philo
 
 
 ======================================================================
 Philip B Janus                    ||  [log in to unmask]
 Law School List Owner             ||  1E GULC          <*>
 http://www.radix.net/~philo       ||
 ======================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2