As someone who does both (secondary) listowner and postmast tasks from
the same ID, I constantly have problems with the FOR phrase in commands -
if I am acting as postmast for one of my users at a remote site, the
FOR phrase MUST come first, otherwise it seems my ID is checked against
the owners of the list as soon as the command portion is parsed and my
command is rejected because I am not an owner of the list - it appears
to not 'see' the FOR phrase unless it comes first.  Can anyone spell
out the precise rules/differences when using FOR as postmast/listowner.
 
-mike
 
ps - thanks Nick