It typically is viewable as a comment field in the RFC822 headers

X-Tags= Yes

On my client (EUDORA), those are suppressed by my default (though >>X-Tags= Yes
End Replyblah-blah-blah" brings them back)

Dpending upon setup, the X-CC: folks may not be able to respond to the
list (send= private).  Finally, the person doing the REPLY, might not do
a REPLY-ALL.

Suggestion, if it is THAT IMPORTANT that the X-CC: folks receive REPLY,
then they should be subscribed (even if in NOMAIL mode and they can have
access to the notebook archives either thru mail or the
WEB).  Alternatively, they can be explicitly referenced in the body by
the original poster who exhorts REPLYs back to them.

All other solutions are inherently flawed.

/Pete Weiss @ Penn State

At 14:27 07/30/2002 Tuesday, Kevin Hylton wrote:
 >When someone sends mail to my list, and to someone else not on the list,
 >my group only sees the list as the intended address, and not the other
 >recipients.
 >
 >For example:
 >
 >To: [log in to unmask] ; [log in to unmask]
 >Subject: blah blah balh
 >Body
 >.
 >
 >Would show up on the other end with just the
 >[log in to unmask], and the other address would not be noted.
 >This makes it very hard to follow multiple recipients, and make sure
 >that we are responding to everyone that needs to be copied on
 >information.
 >
 >Is this a problem with the settings in my List header?
 >
 >Here is what I have set up currently:
 >
 >Global Data Center Management
 >
 >Review= Private
 >Subscription= By Owner
 >Send= Public
 >Notify= No
 >Reply-to= Sender,Respect
 >Validate= No
 >Notebook= No
 >Confidential= Yes
 >X-Tags= Yes
 >
 >Errors-To= [log in to unmask]
 >Editor= [log in to unmask] (Kevin Hylton)
 >Owner= [log in to unmask] (Kevin Hylton)
 >
 >Thanks for the help,
 >
 >Kevin Hylton
 >Global Data Center Administrator
 >International Systems Services
 >America Online Inc.
 >* [log in to unmask]
 >rm -rf /bin/laden
End Reply