Thu, 4 May 1995 23:57:58 -0400
|
>Date: Thu, 27 Apr 1995 17:47:45 +0200
>From: Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: New (1.8b) validate rules
>
>On Thu, 27 Apr 1995 09:32:00 EDT Bill Verity <[log in to unmask]> said:
>
>>Validate= Yes seems to be the "correct" setting under 1.8b. However, it
>>seems to then require confirmation for the SIGNOFF command. I love the
>>confirmation on subscriptions, but I'd really like users to be able to
>>get off without confirming. Can I have my cake and eat it too? When I
>>see an unconfirmed SIGNOFF request, I normally delete the user myself.
>
>"Validate=" is a security keyword. There are several levels of security
>which all apply consistently to all commands. It wouldn't make sense to
>close one door and leave the other one wide open. If you want
>confirmation on subscriptions only, you can use "Subscription= Open,
>Confirm", which works independently of "Validate=".
>
> Eric
I beg to differ Eric, but on yonder lists at eWorld, I have the lists at
Subscription= Open and had Validate= Yes, and for removing someone or
having them remove themselves required confirmation.
John Pimentel
|
|
|