The problem appears to be an unbalanced angle bracket, but who is
supposed to correct it?  The Belgians say it's up to us because they
have no problems like this otherwise.  But we have no problem except
with the Belgians.
 
 
Joe Ransdell    [log in to unmask]
 
-------header follows--------------------------------------------
 
 
From:   IN%"[log in to unmask]"  5-OCT-1993 13:12:20.68
To:     IN%"[log in to unmask]"
CC:
Subj:   Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
 
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Return-path: Mailer-Daemon <@TTUVM1.TTU.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Return-path: Mailer-Daemon <@TTUVM1.TTU.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from Jnet-DAEMON by ttacs.ttu.edu (PMDF #3262 ) id
 <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 13:00:52 CST
Received: From TTUVM1(MAILER) by TTACS2 with Jnet id 9388 for BNJMR@TTACS; Tue,
 5 Oct 1993 12:59 CDT
Received: from TTUVM1.BITNET (NJE origin LISTSERV@TTUVM1) by TTUVM1.TTU.EDU
 (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9621; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 12:58:28 -0500
Received: from VM1.rice.ucl.ac.be (NJE origin MAILER@BUCLLN11) by
 TTUVM1.TTU.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9619; Tue,
 5 Oct 1993 12:58:27 -0500
Received: from BUCLLN11 by VM1.rice.ucl.ac.be (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
 id 7210; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:35 CET
Received: from etal.ucl.ac.be by Vm1.rice.ucl.ac.be (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
 TCP; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:34 CET
Received: by etal.ucl.ac.be (4.1/tvs-05/01/93-G) id AB02545; Tue,
 5 Oct 93 18:58:56 +0100
Date: 05 Oct 1993 18:58:56 +0100
From: [log in to unmask] (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
To: [log in to unmask]
Message-id: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
 
   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <@Vm1.rice.ucl.ac.be:[log in to unmask]>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <[log in to unmask]>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <[log in to unmask]>... Unbalanced '<'
 
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from Vm1.rice.ucl.ac.be by etal.ucl.ac.be (4.1/tvs-05/01/93-G)
        id AA02543; Tue, 5 Oct 93 18:58:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from Post-office.ucl.ac.be by Vm1.rice.ucl.ac.be (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1292; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:29 CET
Received: from VM1.rice.ucl.ac.be by Post-office.ucl.ac.be with BSMTP (6850) id
 <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:28 +0100
Received: from BUCLLN11 by VM1.rice.ucl.ac.be (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
 id 7206; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:28 CET
Received: from YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu by Vm1.rice.ucl.ac.be (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with TCP; Tue, 05 Oct 93 18:57:26 CET
Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8185; Tue, 05 Oct 93 13:55:43 EDT
Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@YALEVM) by
 YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2822; Tue, 5 Oct 1993
 13:52:08 -0400
Date:         Tue, 5 Oct 1993 12:51:38 -0600
Reply-To: "PEIRCE-L    The Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce" <PEIRCE-L%TTUVM1.bit
 [log in to unmask]
Sender: "PEIRCE-L    The Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce" <PEIRCE-L%TTUVM1.bitne
 [log in to unmask]>
From: "Joseph Ransdell <[log in to unmask]>" <BNJMR%TTACS.bi
 [log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: bogus citation
To: Multiple recipients of list PEIRCE-L
 <[log in to unmask]>