Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 1997 07:34:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 10:04 PM 1/20/97 EST, you wrote:
>>Besides, it lets folks see some of the fun spam.....all we need is for
>>folks here NOT bitching about spam....and not starting a discussion of it.
>
> If you want to see spam, go to SPAM-L. This is *NOT* a spam list. I
>would have thought that that was clear.
>
> Perhaps you will change your mind when the number of spams per day is
>about 5 or so. Then, perhaps, you too will "bitch" about it. Perhaps
>you are one of the lucky few people who do not have to deal with 5+
>spams a day. I suspect you are NOT on SPAM-L and so don't understand
>the extent of the problem. Perhaps you would like to deal with the 37
>spams I got today. Make that 38. Just 3 lists worth of spam.
Do people with listserv lists really get 5+ spams/day? I'm running a law
school mailing list (surely a high priority target for the political spams)
GATED TO USENET, and might have seen three spams on the list in the past
month.
Just remembered- NOSPAM is off right now, too...
I must be missing out on something.
Philo
--
======================================================================
Philo ||
[log in to unmask] || Due to a system error,
2E GULC <*> || Eudora cannot display a .sig
http://www.radix.net/~philo ||
======================================================================
|
|
|