On Tue, 21 Mar 19:32, Geffrey Glencoe Thorpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Before I delete this fellow from my list, I thought I I'd ask if anyone
>knows why posts sent to a Venezuela address might not be getting to the
>subscriber.  The person's domain is conicit.ve.
>
>Is there any additional info--or header change--that needs to be tagged onto
>here, for this post to make it out.  Or is it just "one of those things" ?
                                No.   Yes.
 
Well, that host is "reachable", but it is "slow", especially the "hop"
into Venezuela, as the following traces indicate.  Have patience.
+++++
# traceroute dino.conicit.ve
 ...
 6  border1-serial2-0.Seattle.mci.net (204.70.52.9)      40 ms   52 ms   64 ms
 7  core-fddi-0.Seattle.mci.net (204.70.2.145)           45 ms   47 ms   51 ms
 8  core-hssi-2.SanFrancisco.mci.net (204.70.1.50)       85 ms   75 ms   99 ms
 9  border3-fddi0-0.SanFrancisco.mci.net (204.70.2.163)  92 ms   76 ms   77 ms
10  149.20.64.1 (149.20.64.1)                            83 ms  231 ms   82 ms
11  149.20.6.2 (149.20.6.2)                             156 ms  171 ms  170 ms
12  unclesam-gateway.jvnc.net (130.94.15.249)           184 ms  196 ms  153 ms
13  nomad-gateway.jvnc.net (130.94.14.249)              124 ms  171 ms   *
14  fenchurch-gateway.jvnc.net (130.94.0.49)            148 ms  205 ms  202 ms
15  trillian-gateway.jvnc.net (192.12.211.75)           230 ms  169 ms  154 ms
16  conicit-gateway.saicyt.net.ve (150.188.2.1)        3790 ms   *     2545 ms
17  ?                             (?)                    *       *        *
18  dino.conicit.ve (150.188.1.10)                       *       *     3371 ms
# /etc/ping dino.conicit.ve.
64 bytes from 150.188.1.10: icmp_seq=0. time=3325. ms
64 bytes from 150.188.1.10: icmp_seq=3. time=3042. ms
64 bytes from 150.188.1.10: icmp_seq=4. time=4267. ms
----dino.conicit.ve PING Statistics----
10 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 70% packet loss
round-trip (ms)  min/avg/max = 3042/3544/4267
# exit