Thu, 18 Apr 1996 07:07:03 +0200
|
Currently this isn't networked. The problem is that if you network it,
you may be looking at hundreds (and, in a year, possibly thousands) of
redundant alerts. For a spam, this is legitimate, because of the cost of
the spam to the LISTSERV site (not just the hardware but all the manpower
wasted answering flames) is so enormous that there's basically nothing
short of sending a spam yourself that would end up costing you less. Even
if it were to take a thousand alerts to block the spam, it would still be
cheaper than letting it through. Plus, spam is time critical, so you
really want all the alerts you can get from as many high-speed servers as
possible. A spoofed subscription on the other hand doesn't cost all that
much for the LISTSERV site, and if it takes you a few hours to cancel it,
so what. The victim will be flooded with Majordomo mail for weeks to come
anyway.
Again, my hope is that someone will be sued for this and that this will
make the headlines, and then people will stop. Unlike spam, it's a simple
legal case, and I can certainly see how shops like AOL or CompuServe
would offer free legal support to establish a precedent. It must not be
fun for them when the victim is one of their customers.
Eric
|
|
|