Gentlemen,
                I did not mean to propose such a stringent view of the
                internet. The EARN documents are little more than a
                guide to good manners in a civilized society of
                scholars. They are a helpful reference in handling
                some delicate problems. I believe that, perhaps, I
                should explain something about myself which might
                alleviate some of the debate. Although my address is
                in North America, my background and training make me very
                much a European and in that environment noticeably
                French although I speak several other languages and am
                culturally immersed in at least three other European
                cultures. I apologize if this has made me appear
                somewhat myopic with regard to the reading of the
                document: my mindset is such that I would not see the
                problem unless I were reminded of it. In effect, most
                of the time I think in French.  Please accept my
                apologies if this natural proclivity imposes on some
                sense of freedom which I understand as expressed in a
                different but eloquent voice. When I am in Europe, I
                must admit that I feel totally free which as you know
                brings a certain bliss and euphoria. I tend to believe
                that the great documents of British law and the French
                "egalite, fraternite, liberte" are the very
                foundations of civilization which prevent us from
                sliding into barbarity. This will give you some sense
                of how I view the EARN document. Bear in mind also
                that I read it in French.
 
                Paul.
--
 
Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio,  University of Toronto  [log in to unmask]