Why not?  If, as a List Owner, I could make someone a Co-Owner - someone who
could do everything I could do except change the Owner (myself), then a coup
could not happen.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Peters" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LSTOWN-L] coup fears...


> But that still wouldn't preclude a coup.  Defacto if nothing else, right?
>
>                       Bryan Fritchie
>                       <[log in to unmask]>         To:
[log in to unmask]
>                       Sent by: "LISTSERV           cc:
>                       list owners' forum"          Subject: Re: coup
fears...
>                       <[log in to unmask]
>                       .LSOFT.COM>
>
>
>                       06/19/2003 10:47 AM
>                       Please respond to
>                       "LISTSERV list
>                       owners' forum"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since this appears to be an issue, is there a possibility that future
> versions can specifically have both an Owner and a Co-Owner property?
That
> way a Co-Owner could do just about everything except replace the Owner.
> Both Owner and Co-Owner could still allow multiple entries, but then there
> would be a definitive meaning between the different roles.
>
>
>
>