Wed, 16 Mar 1994 11:52:58 -0500
|
Does anybody have some specific suggestions about what
to say when an error or bounce message goes to the list
instead of the list-owner? Since I am basically an
end user it is difficult for me to 'lecture' the
systems person responsible for configuring mailing
software at some site. Also, who specifically should
I msg? Postmaster@(the specific host), postmaster@(the domain)
or some kind of technical contact person whose name I might
see with the Whois command?
Charlie Hofacker [log in to unmask]
---Msg mailed to list which inspired my question---------
From [log in to unmask]:[log in to unmask] Wed Mar 16 03:36:00 1994
Received: from nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu by garnet.acns.fsu.edu with SMTP (5.65c/25-eef)
id AA19580; Wed, 16 Mar 1994 10:40:08 -0500
Received: from NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU by nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 0659; Wed, 16 Mar 94 10:40:03 EST
Received: from NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@NERVM) by NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6986; Wed, 16 Mar 1994 10:40:01 -0500
Return-Path: <@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from NERVM (NJE origin SMTP@NERVM) by NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU (LMail
V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6984; Wed, 16 Mar 1994 10:40:01 -0500
Received: from lobby.ti.com by nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Wed, 16 Mar 94 10:39:59 EST
Received: from itg.ti.com ([128.247.93.50]) by lobby.ti.com with SMTP
(5.65c/LAI-3.2) id AA28449; Wed, 16 Mar 1994 09:40:35 -0600
Received: from DSKMGWS2.ITG.TI.COM by itg.ti.com (4.1/ITG-1.1)
id AA29160; Wed, 16 Mar 94 09:36:58 CST
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask] (-MaiSer-)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 09:36 CST
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Delivery status: Re: Sports Marketing List
Status: RO
A delivery problem was encountered with your message:
Error 101: Unknown user at destination host
Recipient address(es) in error:
[log in to unmask]
Original subject: Re: Sports Marketing List
---- Original text of message follows:
On 14-MAR-1994 22:23:18.46, Steve Tucker
<[log in to unmask]>, wrote:
>>>Let's get this list going!<<<
Regarding sports marketing, I seem to remember hearing of a list somewhere.
...
|
|
|