Well, this is all nice, but who's going to pay the lawyers' fees? C & S
are rude, obnoxious pains, but we are sort of like the last of the
Romans.. we don't have money to pay for our defense and soon we'll be
beseiged by the barbarians. Oh wait.. Romans fell because they didn't
want to pay for her defense.. Hmmm...
 
-dorian
 
Dorian Kim | Co-moderator rec.sport.baseball.analysis. Questions, comments,
flames should be sent to [log in to unmask] and/or [log in to unmask]
 
On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Keith Moore wrote:
 
> >
> > I absolutely agree.  This is the worst type of net-bashing I have seen
> > so far---these people are not pretending to be innocent: they added
> > an 'Approved:' header line so as to get through to every possible
> > news group without the intervention of moderators.
> >
> > I think a severe punishment is in place here.  I think the providers of
> > cyber.sell.com should ban the entire site from the net for a few weeks,
> > so they're forced to take measures against the people who distributed
> > the ad.
>
> I think a class-action suit might be in order.  Perhaps the net could
> sue them for the cost of the disk space taken up by the number of
> spammed copies, times the number of sites on Usenet.  Even if it is
> only a few dollars per site the total amount could be substantial.
>
> How do we get something like this started?
>
> Keith Moore
>