Winship <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I see nothing illogical about it.  One certainly doesn't want the
> bottom banner to appear in each of the postings in the digest, cluttering
> up the place needlessly, but the digest subscribers need to know what
> is in the banner, so they get it once per mailing, just like everyone
> else: one distribution, one banner.

I can't argue with most of what you said, but what about digests that do
*not* come out daily? What about DIGEST-H? Why have that *and* a top/bottom
banner? Why keep bottom banner and dump top banner?

I'm not saying all these decisions were wrong, but they were arbitrary and
they do have some strange consequences.

--
Peter C.S. Adams <[log in to unmask]>
co-owner, PAGEMAKR mailing list <http://www.hypercorp.com/gain/pm/>
"Common courtesy is not so common." -- apologies to Voltaire