At 5:32 PM -0700 5/24/01, Liz Marr wrote:
>This is the second "rejection" I've gotten today from posts that I've already
>sent and seen in the list much earlier.  Here are the headers, the problem
>appears to be someone called "outblaze.com" and "[log in to unmask]"

Very interesting, Liz, but at least yours got to the list. I got a
message from a very upset subscriber (one of those you really WANT on
your list) because she got her message sent back to her. She looked
at the first three lines, saw
X-From_:
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Wed May 23 00:58:38 2001
and decided she must be on Review. She was so upset that she signed
off. However, none of us had put her on Review, and of course, she
wouldn't have gotten this back if we had, which we had to explain to
her. I have no idea why this was rejected.

We did explain to her and she came back, but it was pretty upsetting
at the time.

Mary (header below)

Received: by mail (mbox xxxx)
  (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Wed May 23 01:01:38 2001)
X-From_:
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Wed May 23 00:58:38 2001
Return-Path:
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
Received: from guest.dc.lsoft.com (guest.dc.lsoft.com [209.119.1.14])
  by mail.ezwv.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12928
  for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 23 May 2001 00:58:38 -0400
Received: from mango (209.119.1.21) by guest.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for
OpenVMS v1.1b) with SMTP id
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>;
Wed, 23 May 2001 0:51:04 -0500
Received: from APPLE.EASE.LSOFT.COM by APPLE.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
           release 1.8d) with spool id 2509110 for

<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask];
Wed, 23 May 2001 00:58:37 -0400
Received: from 209.119.1.21 by NETPALS.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0d) with TCP;
           Wed, 23 May 2001 00:58:36 -0400
Received: from postoffice.wirefire.com (postoffice1.wirefire.com) by
           mango.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id

<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>;
Wed, 23 May 2001 0:58:36 -0400
Received: from storm ([206.102.33.116]) by postoffice.wirefire.com (Post.Office
           MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70118U14000L1400S0V35) with SMTP id com
           for
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>;
Wed, 23 May 2001 00:59:07 -0400
References:
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Message-ID:  <08a501c0e345$4f88fc40$742166ce@storm>
Date:         Wed, 23 May 2001 01:00:37 -0400
Reply-To: All Breed Conformation Group
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
Sender: All Breed Conformation Group
<<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
From: subscriber <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [SD-L] Germany
To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]