In article <[log in to unmask]>, Resent-From: "A. Ralph
Papakhian" <PAPAKHI@IUBVM> says:
>We are still getting this response from DUKEMVS. I changed MAIL-VIA=
>to DIST. Would that cause a problem with DUKEMVS? Problems with getting
>listserv mail to Duke have been wearing several people out. So if anyone
>has some light to shed that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Well, I'll take a guess, but... No promises!
From the Received: lines, it looks like LISTSERV@DUKEVM is receiving
the DIST job, and forwarding it in BSMTP format to [log in to unmask]
(Everything ok so far.) Then MAILER@DUKEVM is forwarding the DUKEMVS
piece in BSMTP format to (presumably) [log in to unmask] At least that's
what MAILER@DUKEVM is currently claiming it will do with DUKEMVS mail.
(I must confess here, that I know almost *nothing* about UCLAMAIL.)
It then looks like MAILER@DUKEMVS is receiving the BSMTP file from
MAILER@DUKEVM, but is ignoring the RCPT TO: lines (or perhaps they are
incorrectly specified (though this seems unlikely)) in the BSMTP
envelope and trying to deliver the mail to the address specified in
the RFC822 To: field: <[log in to unmask]>. Hence the "No valid
recipients for this node" message.
Admittedly, this doesn't seem very likely. But I suppose it might
indicate an incorrectly configured UCLAMAIL system on DUKEMVS. You
might try taking this to the experts on the UCLAMAIL list. They can
probably interpret it much better than I can.
Or, you could delete the DUKEMVS people until it gets straightened out.
That would probably stop the error messages.
Bill
>Cordially,
>A. Ralph Papakhian, Music Library (Co-Listowner for MLA-L@IUBVM)
>Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
>(812) 855-2970 [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>The enclosed mail file, found in the MLA-L reader and shown under the spoolid
>4451 in the console log, has been identified as a possible delivery error
>notice for the following reason: mail subject indicates a delivery problem.
>
>-------------------- Message in error (33 lines) -------------------------
>Received: from DUKEMVS.BITNET (POSTMAN) by iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu (Mailer
>R2.08)
> with BSMTP id 2801; Sat, 21 Mar 92 13:15:27 EST
>Date: Sat, 21 Mar 92 13:12 EST
>To: [log in to unmask]
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Undelivered mail
>
>Your mail was not delivered to some or all of its
>intended recipients for the following reason(s):
>
>6001 no valid recipients for this node
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Received: (from DUKEVM.BITNET for <[log in to unmask]> via BSMTP)
>Received: (from MAILER@DUKEVM for MAILER@DUKEMVS via NJE)
> (UCLA/Mail V1.500 M-RSCS2005-2005-25); Sat, 21 Mar 92 13:12:34 EST
>Received: from DUKEVM.BITNET by DUKEVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id
> 9707; Sat, 21 Mar 92 13:12:28 EST
>Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1992 18:58:17 MET
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>Sender: "Music Library Association Mailing List" <[log in to unmask]>
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: ADD
>To: Multiple recipients of list MLA-L <[log in to unmask]>
>
>I'd like to participate with the Music Library Association
>musical mailing list. Please subscribe me as
>[log in to unmask]
>
>Thanx,
>
> Patsch
|
