>>Received: from news1.radix.net (news1.radix.net [204.157.34.41]) by
>saltmine.radix.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA16705 for
><[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:16:58 -0500 (EST)
 
>>Received: from mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net (mailhost.worldnet.att.net
>[204.127.129.4]) by news1.radix.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA17686
>for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:18:42 -0500 (EST)
>>Received: from LOCALNAME ([207.146.83.100]) by mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net
>>          (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AAA13635;
>>          Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:16:46 +0000
 
My guess is that Trey bcc'd you.  Look at the above two RECEIVED lines --
they "say" that some att.net system (which is what Trey is using)
sent it to another att.net system which sent it to [log in to unmask]
 
No LISTSERV facilities were involved in delivering this SUB request
to YOUR mailbox.
 
>>X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>From: Trey hicksock <[log in to unmask]>
>>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:16:46 +0000
>>Message-ID: <19961106131644.AAA13635@LOCALNAME>
>>
>>subscribe lawsch-l trey hicksock
 
--  co-owner:   INFOSYS, TQM-L, CPARK-L, ERAPPA-L, JANITORS, LDBASE-L, et -L
URL:mailto:[log in to unmask]                "I get paid by the millisecond"