Thu, 4 Jan 1996 16:44:29 EST
|
On Thu, 4 Jan 1996 15:30:36 -0500 David W. James said:
>Is this kind of thing a known problem? This isn't the first time I've heard
>this complaint, but now it has reached a number where I don't think that it is
>just misobservation. The past complaints have been questions like "I just saw
>a response to a message I didn't see in a digest..." type things that were hard
>to track. This one at least has some objective measure.
The problem with a truncated digest is something else entirely. If people
aren't receiving the whole digest, the most common reason is that a gateway
somewhere is truncating it at 1000 or 1500 lines. For this reason, if you
have a list that generates large daily digests, you might want to experiment
with setting the Size(nnn) parameter of the Digest= keyword to a value like
1000 or 1500. Pros: It makes the digest smaller and more likely to get
through a brain-damaged gateway. Cons: The more traffic you have, the
more digests get cut during the day. I have WIN95-L set to cut a "special
issue" every 1000 or 1500 lines (can't remember which) and it puts out
6-8 digests/day.
Nathan
|
|
|