LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:56:55 -0400
text/plain (68 lines)
Anti-spam software w/ its concept of what / where "constitutes" spam, had
decided that either this mail or site falls into that category.

 ><<< 550 Mail from 206.185.162.193 refused, see http://relays.radparker.com
 >554 marie@infohwy.com... Service unavailable

"Baffled" seems like a multi-purpose description that would fit.

At 01:09 08/16/1999 Monday , Pauline M. Marshall wrote:
 >I have asked on other listowner lists, to no avail.  Can anyone explain
 >to me, why this mail is boucing?  Does Lsoft relay thru open servers?
 >If not, why does the message-id not originate from lsoft?  I am usually
 >really good at figuring out these errors, but this one has me pretty
 >baffled.  Thanx.
 >
 >------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
 >Subject:                DOG-RESCUE: error report from
SERVER.EMMOTT-WALKER.COM
 >
 >The enclosed message has been identified as a delivery error for the
 >DOG-RESCUE list because it was sent to
 >[log in to unmask]
 >
 >------------------------------ Message in error
-------------------------------
 >Received: from server.emmott-walker.com by mango.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for
 >          Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>;
 >          Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:06:24 -0400
 >Received: from localhost (localhost) by server.emmott-walker.com
 >          (980427.SGI.8.8.8/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via internal id TAA18854; Fri,
 >          13 Aug 1999 19:02:42 -0500 (CDT)
 >Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:42 -0500 (CDT)
 >From: [log in to unmask] (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
 >Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
 >Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
 >To: <[log in to unmask]>
 >Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
 >
 >The original message was received at Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
 >from demo.lsoft.com [209.119.0.46]
 >
 >   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
 >[log in to unmask]
 >    (expanded from: <[log in to unmask]>)
 >
 >   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
 >... while talking to mail.infohwy.com.:
 >>>> MAIL From:<[log in to unmask]>
 ><<< 550 Mail from 206.185.162.193 refused, see http://relays.radparker.com
 >554 marie@infohwy.com... Service unavailable
 >
 >   ----- Original message follows -----
 >
 >Received: from mango.ease.lsoft.com (demo.lsoft.com [209.119.0.46]) by
 >server.emmott-walker.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id
 >TAA18853 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
 >Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
 >Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
 >Received: from mango (mango.ease.lsoft.com) by mango.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP
 >for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri,
 >13 Aug 1999 20:05:33 -0400
 >Date:     Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:04:35 -0400
 >Reply-To: Dog Rescue <[log in to unmask]>
 >Sender: Dog Rescue <[log in to unmask]>
 >From: Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>
 >Subject:  DOG-RESCUE Digest - 13 Aug 1999 - Special issue (#1999-898)
 >To: Recipients of DOG-RESCUE digests <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2