On: Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:04:11PM -0600,Hal Keen Wrote:

} Let's see, now: You realize that SA is not reporting the spam scores, and
} you left out the content of the message. That doesn't give them much data to
} work with.

I included the headers (at least as much as I was sent) and only removed
(for privacy) the text of the message (which was plain text).

I just looked at it a bit more carefully and it now appears I was wrong
in thinking that Lsoft's Apple node bounced it.  This looks like hotmail is
the one who doesn't like it (hotmail handles sympatico.ca's mail) and
the complaint should go to sympatico.

Do you agree?

> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: February 4, 2008 4:33 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
>
> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
>
> Delivery to the following recipients failed.
>
>        [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns;bay0-omc2-s16.bay0.hotmail.com
> Received-From-MTA: dns;BAYC1-PASMTP14
> Arrival-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:32:26 -0800
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;[log in to unmask]



--
Rich Greenberg  N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians  Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach                                     Asst Owner:Sibernet-L