A few days ago I forwarded an error report I had received asking for
guidance in how to determine which British subscriber this report related
to since there was a blank line where the identification of the problem
subscriber should be.  Unfortunately, in the cause of reducing the number
of lines sent to the bare minimum I over-cut, deleting the Received lines.
 
I have once again received that type of error message so here is one of
them, with nothing deleted.
 
Judith Hopkins, Listowner of Autocat@ubvm
   [log in to unmask]
 
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list
AUTOCAT because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-autocat' mailbox.
 
------------------------------ Message in error -------------------------------
Received: from UBVM (NJE origin SMTP@UBVM) by UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LMail
          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2239; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:22:59 -0400
Received: from sun2.mhs-relay.ac.uk by UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
   with TCP; Thu, 25 Apr 96 17:22:57 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.ac.uk by sun2.mhs-relay.ac.uk
          id <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 22:23:04 +0100
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 22:23:02 +0100
Subject: WARNING: message delayed at "mhs-relay.ac.uk"
 
 
The following message:
 
UA-ID:  Re: Outsourci...
MSG-ID: <[log in to unmask]
Q-ID:   sun2.mhs:62/msg.22134-0
 
has not been delivered to the intended recipient:
 
 
 
despite repeated delivery attempts over the past 24 hours.
 
The  usual cause of this problem is that the remote system is temporarily
unavailable.
 
Delivery will continue to be attempted up to a total elapsed time of  168
hours, ie 7 days.
 
You  will  be  informed  if  delivery proves to be impossible within this
time.
 
Please quote the Q-ID in any queries regarding this mail.