Kathleen Bruce wrote:
>
> Duane, it is my thought that although you can set someone quietly to review,
> that IF and when they send a message to the list, they get a message saying
> that the post has been sent to the listowner for review. I do not know of
> any way to change this. If there is, though, I'd like to know.  It kind of
> defeats the purpose, because the troublemakers usually become even more
> invective and p/od, and continue to rant and rave on the lists. Ack.

On the other hand, if there is no way to fix it so that someone is
silently set to review, then you can honestly tell people that they
would KNOW if they are.  The reverse problem is people who get
paranoid when AOL messes up and posts get lost in the ether.

One presumes the only way the troublemaker can continue to rant and
rave is to keep changing addresses, and that eventually that would
get stale (if it is AOL addresses, write to AOL management.) --
not to mention expensive.

Mary Schweitzer