Sat, 25 Mar 1995 06:58:20 -0500
|
Aldo,
You seem to have missed the most important section of my
posting: ie you objected to the practices and that the
individual should have ceased immediately. Since you extended
your argument, let me clarify what I meant by
redistribution. If someone sends a message with the header,
please circulate or redistribute, I assume that it is for
redistribution and several governments send information which
is used either to raise issues which they would like to survey
internationally or to promote aspects of, in my case, computers
in medicine. As for the quality issue, I avoid the subject out
of modesty but we maintain a record of the praise of our
activities and support of our group from international
government and from the major supporting governments. We deal
with the major issues in our field and actually are leaders
with major impact on some of the most significantly active
governments in the world. We do our utmost to maintain a high
quality of service which is not without cost and enormous
effort by our centers. This is, I believe, true of all lists.
What the people distributing to our list have to say influences
the shape and development of technology around the world. However,
I believe that this is true of almost all of the lists which
serve single minded purposes. You have either misunderstood my
message or did not understand the process of communication
which links directly into the media and government. Most of
our participants represent their governments or some major
area of research like DOD or DOE or Commerce or
internationally WHO policies and UN initiatives. However, in
all modesty, I believe that most lists share these same purposes
and high standards and that we all spend enormous numbers of
hours and service time achieving the desired goals.
Best regards,
Paul.
--
Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio, University of Toronto [log in to unmask]
|
|
|