Thank you.  Will do so from now on.

Barrett Culmback

-----Original Message-----
From: LISTSERV list owners' forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dan Robinson Indexing
Services
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]


A name to go with an address is helpful. If only when answering a
query/warning on a listowners list. I find this to be a nice courtesy
on many professional lists.

Dan Robinson
drobinson2hwwilson.com


On 6 Dec 00, at 12:45, rbnwic rbcnwmicr wrote:

> agree w/ you there ... did not know one required a 'pedigree' ... in the
> future will use a 'non-spammer-type' email address.  Thank you for the
> insight.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV list owners' forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Nathan Brindle
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:27 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Well, given that you didn't tell anyone that you were a Stanford Ph.D.
> and subscribed from an address that looks suspiciously like one a spammer
> would use, I'm not particularly surprised at the response you got. :)
>
> Nathan
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:24:41 -0800 rbnwic rbcnwmicr said:
> >I am 'the joker' ... just 'happen' to have wide-ranging interests and
> >subscribed to lists per them.  Sorry to 'bother' you 'watchers.'  I have
> >never spammed or spoofed ... not my 'trip.'  Guess a Ph.D. from Stanford
> >isn't enough to 'merit' list-membership?  Not to mention 33 years of
> college
> >teaching.  :-)
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: LISTSERV list owners' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> >Behalf Of Scout
> >Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:06 PM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >> I did a simple DejaNews search:
> >>
> >> http://www.deja.com/usenet
> >>
> >> and found no hits (though I'm in there so I guess the SEARCH function
> >> does work).
> >
> >Don't know if this person has spammed to usenet .. and it's very rare..
in
> >my opinion, for someone to to to all the work to sub to.. confirm sub,
then
> >spam email lists.. so whoever this joker is.. gotta admire the work ethic
> >;-))
> >
> >  ...Cleo  [log in to unmask]
>