Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:49:20 -0400
|
On: Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:32AM -0600,Ben Parker Wrote:
} So, even with a proper hostname alias configuration, LISTSERV will still
} not consider
}
} [log in to unmask]
} [log in to unmask]
}
} as equivalent addresses for the purpose of duplicate checking and there is
} presently no reasonable way to make LISTSERV do so.
And I would have no expectation of anything different. Thats a
completely different case than:
> [log in to unmask]
>and
> [log in to unmask]
Which the hostname alias configuration can handle.
--
Rich Greenberg Work: Rich.Greenberg atsign worldspan.com +1 770-563-6656
N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign panix.com +1 770-321-6507
Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT), Red & Shasta(Husky,(RIP)) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|