Sat, 12 Sep 1992 18:25:50 +0200
|
On Sat, 12 Sep 1992 14:57:00 N "H.J. Woltring, fax/tel +31.40.413 744"
<WOLTRING@HNYKUN53> said:
>I guess that I was wondering whether there are, and even more will be
>ways in which LISTSERV and/or LISTEARN are and/or will be at the dis-
>posal of non-BITNET sites in view of the suspected phasing out of BIT-
>NET -- whether for free or for a fee?
The present version will not work in a non-BITNET environment without
BITEARN NODES and so on. It can be made to work locally, that is, one can
create control files and tables which tell the server that it is part of
a very small local network with just the local IBM machines, but then you
get a purely local server with no network-wide awareness - it thinks it
is the only server in the world. Not a satisfactory setup.
I cannot speak for the EARN Association of course, but it would seem
pretty suicidal to spend money developing a version that can work outside
BITNET and then give it for free to anyone who is interested in leaving
the network.
Speaking about the US, the cost of staying on BITNET is a few thousand
dollars a year for CREN membership, depending on the size of the
university, plus 1-2000 for VMNET. The membership cost is fixed and you
can connect as many nodes as you want for the same price; if you have
local high-speed connections (SNA, CTC's, whatever), you will only need
one VMNET license on your "gateway" node. Sure, there is still some room
for making a profit, but the software would have to be pretty cheap to be
competitive with the free license you get for the cost of CREN membership
- which also gives you more than just LISTSERV.
Eric
|
|
|