On 2 Sep 2004 at 11:05, Pete Weiss wrote:

> At 10:32 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>  >*
>  >*  The Nameless Coffee House Mailing List
>  >*
>  >*  [log in to unmask] (Maureen Leblanc)
>  >*  Owner= Quiet: ,[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask]
>  >*  Owner= [log in to unmask] (George LeBlanc)
>  >*  Review= Owners
>  >*  Subscription= Open
>  >*  Send= Owners
>  >*  Ack= Yes
>  >*  Files= No
>  >*  Mail-Via= DIST2
>  >*  Notebook= No
>  >*  Notify= Yes
>  >*  Renewal= Yearly
>  >*  Default-Options= Repro, Review
>  >*  Editor= Owner
>  >*  Stats= Normal, Private
>  >*  Topics= STAFF, ANNOUNCE, PERFOFRMERS
>  >*  Default-Topics= ANNOUNCE
>  >*  X-Tags= Yes
>  >*  Auto-Delete= Yes,Full-Auto,Delay(1),Max(25)
>  >*  Created 1998/08
> End Reply
>
>
> Just to be sure, issue
>
> FREE namelessjavahse

I think someone at mit might've done that! (I'd appealed to listserv
maintainer at mit for a little help.)
Just re-sent the announcement message again and it worked!

Actually, I'd also deleted a couple of extraneous header keywords
and re-put the header:
default-options= review seemed to not be necessary, what with
send= owners being defined!  Editor= owner  also seemed
unnecessary with send= owner in place.

So ... whatever worked... it worked, and 'though I don't have my
copy from the distribution yet, the machine is telling me it went out
successfully.

Also updated the spelling of "performers" in the header pete!
Thanks!

Will updating and re-putting the header with subscription=
Subscription= Open,Confirm do it, do you think? That seems to be
fairly protective of everyone.

Thank you as always!

maureen


>
> Are the TOPICS really properly defined e.g. PERFOFRMERS ?
>
> Thus, if you emailed
>
> SUBJECT: PERFORMERS: blah*3
>
> only OTHER: subscribers would "get it"
>
> Finally, SUBSCRIPTION= OPEN is no longer a good idea :-(
>
> /Pete @ Penn State