> > Strikes me that one of the central problems with attachments, after
> > sheer size, is inconsistency: most of them show up in archives as
> > screenfuls of gibberish.  I encourage people to put them on websites
> > and post the url to the list (and I'll consider putting them on a Web
> > site if they don't have access to one).
>
> MIME attachments show up in the LISTSERV web archives just fine -- as
> links that the user can click on do download the file.  Uuencoded
> attachments do show up in their raw form.

Sorry to respond to my own message, but some mail systems will
automatically decode a uuencoded file in a received message.  Thus it
would be helpful if the LISTSERV web interface had the ability to send
you a copy of an archived message.  There are other circumstances in
which this would be useful too.