On: Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:56:29AM -0500,Jan Guthrie Wrote:

} Along these lines, I am consider our currently "plain text" list to
} allow HTML.   But, when I decided just to allow attachments, it was
} a huge problem having to change the type of digest that each member
} received.  The most commonly used version of digest just showed
} "miles" of code instead of the pictures.
}
} If I change the list to allow HTML, does anyone know the immediate
} effect of those on digest?

Make them either DIGEST MIME or DIGEST HTML.  Either will give a list of
posts with a link to see the actual post.  MIME works better with some
mailers, HTML works better with others.

--
Rich Greenberg  Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines: Val, Red, Shasta, Zero & Casey (At the bridge)        Owner:Chinook-L
Canines: Red & Cinnar (Siberians)  Retired at the beach  Asst Owner:Sibernet-L

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTOWN-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=LSTOWN-L&A=1