At 09:00 AM 8/27/96 EDT, you wrote:
>The info that you provided does not indicate a "problem"
>per se.
>
>Please submit all of the headers that you received.  You
>can elide the body of the message if appropriate.
>
>/Pete Weiss at Penn State
 
 
Here is total header - sorry for admission:
 
Date:         Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:30 -0400
From: "L-Soft list server at MACON TECH (1.8b)"
              <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      VPI: error report from GWINNETT.TEC.GA.US
To: [log in to unmask], Jim Watkins <[log in to unmask]>
X-Lsv-Listid: None
 
The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list VPI
because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-vpi' mailbox.
 
------------------------------ Message in error -------------------------------
Received: by gti0.gwinnett.tec.ga.us with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3)
        id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
From: System Administrator <[log in to unmask]>
To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: technology fee
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3
 
 
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
      To:       Multiple recipients of list VPI
      Subject:  Re: technology fee
      Sent:     8/27/96 8:09:12 AM
 
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
      [log in to unmask] on 8/27/96 8:09:12 AM
            Recipient Not Found
            [MSEXCH:IMC:DTAE:Gwinnett Technical Institute:GTI0]
 
 
 
JimW