Mon, 13 Jul 1992 19:03:21 +0200
|
On Sun, 12 Jul 1992 21:16:32 EST Murph Sewall <SEWALL@UCONNVM> said:
>I thought BITNET imposed as size limit of 300K that effectively prevents
>getting larger files from LISTSERV (at least by email though perhaps not
>by message)?
Fortunately, this is true only in theory, and due to the extreme inertia
of the BITNET board in this respect. This made sense in 1985, when more
than 50% of the BITNET traffic had to go through an ever-backlogged 9.6k
link, but that was a long time ago. There is some hope for a change in
the foreseeable future, though: CREN has financed the development of a
BITNET user's guide for VMS, and the resulting file is already larger
than the holy 300k. For now the official line is that one will have to
use FTP if one wants the BITNET user's guide in a single piece, but the
obvious ridiculousness of this argument seems to have had some impact. I
have no idea what will be decided nor when, but I assume the board will
want to avoid having to tell users that they should connect to the
Internet so they can be allowed to legally get a copy of the BITNET
user's guide :-)
Eric
|
|
|